|
|
|
Comments Please review our Code of Conduct rules before posting a comment to this site. Report Abuse, please include specific topic and comment for the fastest response/resolution.
Posted by: John Mulvey - February 03, 2010 03:42 PM
Commissioner Fritz, Thank you for your position and thank you for your work on behalf of taxpayers, neighborhoods and sensible priorities. -John Mulvey
Posted by: Steven Rawley - February 03, 2010 06:13 PM
Thank you Amanda. This is the most cogent, comprehensive analysis I have read of the deal.
Posted by: Mark Bunster - February 04, 2010 12:33 AM
Briefly--the CC URA as I understand it was always intended to help subsidize the RQ improvements; the Paulson deal was never really an impact on that...except for when J Isaac was worried that using the MC for the Beavers--and tapping CC URA funds to do it--would not only crimp their plans for Jumptown but sap their funding source as well. So to say that this forces the Blazers to seek URA funding doesn't really ring true to me--that was always their plan over the number of years this has been discussed. The inflexibility of MLS is something that can be lamented if you wish, although it's not a caprice but rather a serious attempt to maximize interest and revenue for the league, something I think would be important to franchise cities. But it's a fact, and it doesn't mask the reality that but for MLS expansion, the Timbers really had nowhere to go. Their only potential USL opponents left west of the Rockies were in Denver, hardly a sustainable prospect for a minor league team. One certainly wouldn't stand for being held hostage to keep the team just because it would fold--but that's not what happened here; as you admit the terms were strengthened over time and in fact your complaints are less about risk about more about better opportunities in your view. And if PGE were not renovated to accomodate a new major league franchise in the park, the Timbers would by any reasonable guess cease to exist after this year, and you really WOULD get to test your theory on the benefit of an "empty" PGE Park (the Vikings will play there regardless, as well as various exhibitions). Who would pay the previous PGE debt then? By the way, did anyone estimate the City revenue from 200 additional construction paychecks to tax this year? What can we do with the money that won't be needed in Parks every year for field renovation and expansion, now that the Paulsons are picking up part of the tab? What will the impact of the sports medicine facility be, financially? How much is the City saving by getting the construction to cover needed work on underlying infrastructure now, instead of in a crisis after a breakage? If we're going to figure in potential costs one way or the other, let's review them all.
Posted by: Amanda Fritz - February 15, 2010 04:11 PM
Thank you each for your comments. Ticket taxes from the Rose Quarter currently help to pay the existing PGE Park debt, and will continue to do so whether soccer is there and new debt incurred, or not. The current bonds will be paid off in 2022. If we had not taken on new debt with the renovation of the renovation, ticket taxes from Rose Quarter events could then be used for any purpose the Council chose - approximately $2 million beginning in 2017 when the Arena bonds are paid off, and $4.6 million beginning in 2023. While it is likely the funds would have been used to renovate Memorial Coliseum, since many support a nexus between the source of revenue and its use, the Council could choose to spend Spectator Funds on anything, once the bonds are paid off. A memo was circulated to Council between the first and second readings, clarifying that an erroneous statement had been made in this regard at the first hearing. Council has the authority to choose how Spectator Funds are spent after the bonds are paid off. Taxes and fees paid by soccer fans and Merritt Paulson will not even cover the operating costs of PGE Park. Because of the financing structure, the City will receive no income from PGE Park for 18 years, but will continue to incur costs, such as the top-up wages and the cost of replacing the turf every eight years over the length of the Agreement. The money Merritt Paulson is paying to Parks is $50k a year, for five years. The total Parks budget last year was $99 million, of which over $66 million was in operating expenses. While I appreciate Mr. Paulson's donation, it will not make a significant difference in our ability to provide parks maintenance citywide. It is the same amount that Commissioner Fish raised in one week to fund the free concerts in Washington Park last year. Whereas, if we had not tied up the Spectator Fund with the renovation, millions of dollars of that money could have been used to fund facilities in parks. There is nothing in the agreement which provides for rehabilitation of the sewer under PGE Park. All it does is provide construction and design strategies to avoid breaking it. Providence could open a medical facility anywhere in the city.... are you suggesting the soccer players alone will be so injury-prone they will add significantly to profits from local medical care? I agree the employment of 200 construction workers in the stagnant building trades is a significant benefit. Mayor Adams summarized his support likening the deal to a stimulus project, and in that regard borrowing $11.9 million to put 200 people to work may make sense. One difference between this and our federal government is that the City's budget is required to be balanced every year. We are borrowing the income of the future to provide a home for the Timbers, and with the way the deal is structured, we will have no future revenue to give us a return on the investment. What Timbers fans and the majority of the Council said is that the joy of the game and the short term construction jobs are worth the lack of income in later years. Sincerely, I hope you enjoy the entertainment, and I'm glad for those 200 workers and their families. Post a Comment (Sign-In Required) |
I am glad that you voted no on the separation of baseball and MLS. I am sad to see that because of how the deal was negotiated, the improvements to Memorial Coliseum are going to likely be made using URA dollars.
There are so many possibilities to create mixed market housing including housing to own for people under 120% MFI in that district or the Lloyd District. The $24 million could have been used for a risk pool to have multiple developers work on a mixed use project with a grocery store, market housing, low income housing (rent and own), and 80-120 MFI housing (rent and own).
I hope you continue to stand up and make sure city dollars spent benefit all people and not just people with a financial interest in a project.