PortlandOnline

POL Government Elected Officials Commissioner Amanda Fritz What Happened?
Comments on Bull Run water treatment options, 7/27/09

Sent to my colleagues on the Council, 7/27/09:

 

I have reviewed the information sent to our Office from Portland Water Bureau titled, "Response to Portland City Council Questions on Bull Run Treatment Presentations". 

 

I appreciate Commissioner Leonard and Director David Shaff for providing the information and for scheduling a hearing to discuss the preferred treatment option should efforts to avoid additional treatment for cryptosporidium fail.

 

I have some further observations and questions to clarify information in the Response binder.

 

1.   A Revised Total Coliform rule is pending (page 2 of report), with the Proposal from the EPA expected in 2010 and the Final Rule in 2012. 

 

While the new rule will be focused on system delivery risks, treatment of surface water for E. coli may be required by the EPA in the future.

 

Appendix D in the binder states, UV is "highly effective" against E. coli. 

 

Appendix D states direct filtration is "not effective" against E. coli

 

  • Why is the City planning to move forward with filtration, if it does not address a potential future regulation of E. coli?

 

2.   Additional protection against microorganisms over Chlorine treatment

 

The report states on page 4:

 

"UV would not provide any additional treatment over current treatment practices.  Filtration would provide additional benefit for entamoeba histolytica, hepatitis A, salmonella, and cyanotoxins".

 

This statement is contradicted by the data you provided.

 

Appendix D states filtration is "not effective" for Hepatitis A.

 

Appendix D states UV is "highly effective" for Hepatitis A

 

Appendix D states filtration has "no effect" on Salmonella, and

 

Appendix D states UV has a "minimal effect" on Salmonella

 

The Term "minimal" is listed for both UV and filtration for cryptosporidium, so apparently "minimal" is acceptable.

 

Appendix D. Does Not list  Histolytica and cyanotoxins

 

Our research indicates that Cyanotoxins can be destroyed by UV depending upon the organic load in the water.    Filtration removes the cells but not necessarily the toxins stored in the cells.

 

Our research indicates that Entamoeba hystolica is a human intestinal parasite that causes amoebic colitis and liver abscesses. Humans are exposed to the cycts through ingestion of food or water contaminated with human fecal material. Filtration of municipal water removes the parasite.

 

 

  • Why do you state, "PWB is confident that adding another barrier, such as filtration, will provide more protection against these microorganisms than does the current treatment regime",   when the information provided states that it does not?

 

Appendix D  lists 20 microorganisms

 

Chlorine is listed as effective or minimally effective against 12 of them

(4 effective, 8 minimally effective).

 

Of the 16 microorganisms listed where chlorine is not effective or minimally effective, filtration is effective against 4 (1 highly effective, 3 minimally effective). 

 

Of the 16 microorganisms listed where chlorine is not effective or minimally effective, UV is effective against 9 (1 highly effective, 3 effective, 5 minimally effective).

 

  • Using your data, UV is better than twice as effective than filtration against microorganisms not treated by chlorine.  Why then  are you recommending filtration over UV for microorganism protection?

 

OF ALL LISTED CONTAMINANTS

 

5 of 55 contaminants are not treated  by chlorine + filtration, plus 8 with no data.   The 5 where neither chlorine nor filtration is listed as even minimally effective: staphylococcal enterotoxin, T-2 mycotoxin, cacodylic acid, carbofuran, norovirus.

 

2 of 55 contaminants are not treated by chlorine + UV - Anatoxin A, Toxoplasma (no data on filtration), plus 24 with no data.

 

  • When No data is listed it should in turn not be counted … then according to this data,  UV would be the best form of treatment.   Given this data, why does your bar chart on page 8 show filtration to be more effective than UV? 

 

 

 

3.  Carbon Footprint of Filtration facility

 

  • "What is the solid waste disposal process for a filtration facility?", Question 4.4 on page 12, is not answered.  The text discusses how to get the solids out of the backwash water.  Commissioner Saltzman asked what happens to the waste solids after removal.  What is the process for removal and disposal?  What is the carbon footprint of the waste disposal process?

 

  • What will be the cost of pumping the water through the filters vs. the cost of powering a UV light?

 

 

4.  Columbia South Shore Well Field

 

Page 16 states that the well field will be used once in four years with the filtration system, vs. once in three years currently.

 

  • Why is it worth spending $385 million to reduce well field use by only 25%?

 

5.  The current rate projection for filtration in FY 2014-5 is 13-14%, per page 25.

 

  • What would it be for UV?

 

6.  Annual Opperations and Maintenance cost for filtration

 

The report states (p. 26) that Operations and Maintenance is $1.3 million more for filtration than for UV .  Savings from not pumping the wellfield are $209,000, plus estimated savings from reduced turbidity at $275,000 leading to total quantifiable annual savings of filtration at $484,000. 

 

Even taking into account estimated savings, filtration is $800,000 per year more in annual operating costs compared with UV. 

 

  •   Why is filtration worth spending more in annual costs as well as in construction?

 

7.  The PURB Water Sub-team report

 

This group recommends,  "Select the crypto Treatment Technique with the best long term return for water customers regarding all issues facing the Water Bureau.  Filtration should not be ruled out as a treatment option because Bull Run watershed has strong legal and legislative protections of its pristine state".

 

I have heard the statement. "The PURB supports filtration."

 

  • Is there additional written advice from the full PURB which is not in the binder, that states positive support for filtration rather than it "should not be ruled out"?

 

8.  Additional potential contaminants of concern

 

Appendix C states the only microbial contaminants still being considered for regulation are caliciviruses, cyanobacteria, and Helicobacter pylori. 

Appendix D does not list any of these contaminants. 

 

Our Research indicates

Helicobacter pylori

  • bacterium that infects the human stomach and upper gastrointestinal tract
  • Class I carcinogen for stomach cancer
  • waterborne pathogen that has been detected in drinking water
  • UV readily inactivated at levels typically used in treatment plants

 

Our Research indicates

Caliciviruse genus “Norwalk-like viruses”  ---

  • causes acute gastroenteritis throughout the world
  • Is the second most common cause of viral gastroenteritis in children following rotavirus
  • Is listed on EPA drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List
  • Inactivated by UV

 

Our Research indicates

Cyanobacteria

  • Is a photosynthetic bacteria
  • That some cyanobacteria produce poisons, hepatotoxins and neurotoxins  that are stored in the cells
    • That microcystin: a cell bound toxin produced by the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa is the most common of cyanobacterial toxins found in water and is released into water by dying and decaying cells
  • filtration removes cells but not necessarily the toxins stored in the cells
  • activated charcoal, nonofiltration membranes chlorination and ozonation work
  • UV effectiveness depends on the organic load in the water.

 

 

It appears that with these microbial contaminants, U.V. is an effective treatment, and filtration may or may not be useful against them.  

 

  1. Debt service for the Water Filter System vs. UV – While this was not a part of the Report, OMF figures on Revenue Bonds for these projects show that debt service on $100 million in revenue bonds (UV) tops out at $180 million.  Debt Service on $385 million in revenue bonds (filtration) tops out on at almost $700 million. – approximately 3.8 x more expensive.  

 

 

CONCLUSION:  Based on my review of the information in the binder and for the reasons stated below, UV seems to be the better choice for treating Bull Run water, if we are unable to obtain relief in Congress/EPA.   

 

*  UV costs over $200 million less for construction

*  UV treats more microorganisms, including E. coli which is next up for regulatory measures, and it is effective against viruses which filtration is not

*  UV has lower carbon footprint due to need to truck and dispose of waste from filtration plant and use of pump power over gravity flow system in UV.

*  UV has $800,000 lower annual O&M cost

*  UV does not affect taste

*  UV protects the "forest to faucet" branding

*  The cost/benefit ratio of what filtration provides vs UV appears to indicate cost and effectiveness of filtration does not  outweigh long term, operation, maintenance and effectiveness of a UV system. 

 

I support the Resolution on Wednesday's Agenda, with the exception of its identification of filtration as the preferred option if we need to install more treatment. I plan to propose an amendment substituting "ultraviolet" for "filtration" as the backup treatment plan if we are unable to obtain a variance from the Environmental Protection Agency.


Table of Contents
Comments on SDC Waivers for Middle-Income Housing in Old Town Chinatown
One Key Question Press Release
One Key Question Resolution
Vending Carts Regulations brochure (pdf)
2013 Span of Control Report (pdf)
Captioned video of Council hearing on Blood Donations and HIV precautions, September 2013
DHM Oregon Opinion Poll 2013
Department of Justice Settlement Agreement
Resolution on Zoning Confirmation Letter, Oct 2, 2013
Right to Dream Too Zoning Confirmation Letter, for Oct 2 hearing
Street Musicians Agreement FAQs
Street Musicians Agreement (pdf)
Occupancy/rental taxes on hotels, rental vehicles, etc.
Adopted Protected Sick Time Ordinance 3/13/13
Adopted Protected Sick Leave Code
Metro Fact Sheet on the proposed Oregon Convention Center Hotel
Statement on proposed Public Utility District, 7/18/13 (pdf)
Comments on Parks and Development Services, one month into my assignment
Corrected Comments at the vote on the 2013 - 14 Budget
Comments at the vote on the 2013 - 14 Budget
Ordinance creating the Office of Equity and Human Rights, 09/21/10
Job Posting 3/15/13, Administrative Assistant/Constituent Services Specialist
Adopted Protected Sick Leave Code 3/13/13
Helen Moss OpEd in the Oregonian on why Sick Leave is needed now
Task Force Issues Summary
Protected Sick Time Code proposal 2-28-13 (clean version)
Protected Sick Time proposal 2-28-13 showing changes since 1-18-13
Sick Leave Task Force Meeting 3 Notes
Sick Leave Task Force Meeting 2 Notes
Agenda, Earned Sick Leave Task Force Meeting 2
Sick Leave Task Force Meeting 1 Notes
Earned Sick Leave Task Force members
Memo to Venture Portland members on Earned Sick Leave (pdf)
PSU Economists' Analysis of Earned Sick Leave costs and benefits (pdf)
Proposed Sick Leave Code
Proposed Sick Leave Ordinance
NW Parking: Phased Implementation (Exhibit C)
NW Parking: Amended TMA Structure (Exhibit B)
NW Parking: Additional Amendments to Map Boundary
NW Parking: Amended Resolution
Adopted Principles for Budget Advisory Committees
Public Involvement Advisory Council
City Budget Office proposed Code changes
City Budget Office proposed Ordinance
3-1-1 Resolution passed 10/10/12
Link to article commenting on Harvard fluoride study
Substitute Resolution on Coal Trains, 9/19/12
Statement of Intent for improvements in Portland Police Bureau policies and practices, and the City's care for people experiencing mental illnesses, 9/13/12 (pdf)
US Department of Justice Findings in Investigation of Portland Police Bureau, 9/13/12 (pdf)
Comments at the Fluoridation vote, 9/12/12
Open Reservoir Work Session Follow-Up Storage Volumes
Open Reservoir Work Session Follow-Up 08-27-12
DRAFT Summary of current City payments of County services
Library District Budget Impacts
Office of Equity and Human Rights Powerpoint Presentation
Office of Equity and Human Rights One Year Work Plan
Letter to the OLCC from Nine Portland-Area State Legislators
2012 Spirit of Portland Awards Nomination Form
Ordinance Related to Licensing Exterior Areas
OLCC Exterior Areas Petition Document
West Portland Crossroads Report by Patty Lee
Council presentation on Portland Harbor from March 28, 2012
Final State Legislature Summary, 3/7/12
Sidewalks Data
PBA Letter on Downtown Marketing Initiative funding, 2/12
State Legislative Update 2/17/12
Team statistics for the 2009 calendar year
State Legislative Update
Final Resolution on Corporate Personhood
Speech from Oregon Poet Laureate Paulann Petersen
Cox v. New Hampshire 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision
Letter from CFO Rich Goward Regarding City Investment of Funds
Office of Equity and Human Rights Seeks Director
Report from the 1st International Conference on Age-Friendly Cities, Dublin, Ireland September 28-30, 2011
Letter to the Postmaster General
Office of Equity and Human Rights
Response to NECN regarding Last Thursday, 7/28/11
Safer PDX Report Powerpoint
Mid-project Presentation to Council, Safer PDX
Proposed Office of Equity Work Plan, 8/17 Public Review Draft
Proposed draft Equity Office creation ordinance, 8/17 public review draft
Garbage Rates and Options, October 2011
East Portland Expo Program 2011 (pdf)
State Legislative Update 6/30/11
Technology Oversight Committee Application information (pdf)
State Legislative Update 6/24/11
State Legislative Update 6/19/11
State Legislative Update 6/10/11
State Legislative Update 5/28/11
Reports on Equity/Disparities
State Legislative Update 4/29/11
BOEC (9-1-1 Center) 2011-12 Budget Advisory Committee presentation
Equity Office Concept - DRAFT 3/22/11
Equity Office Concept - DRAFT 3/22/11
3/3/11 Update on siting of Wireless Antennas in neighborhoods
Video of Portland Broadband Strategic Plan kickoff session
Biographies of 2011 Charter Commission members
Mayor Adams's response on Human Trafficking statistics and the real problem we face
2011 Charter Commission process Q & A
Appointees to the 2011 City Charter Commission
2011 Charter Commission Appointment Resolution
Sidewalk Management Citations Data, June - August 2010
Resolution on Broadband Strategic Plan, 9/22/10
Summary of Proposed Portland Alcohol Impact Area
OLCC information on Alcohol Impact Areas
National Women's Health Week Project Report
Sidewalk Management Plan updates
Planning for SW Parks
Comments on West Hayden Island Resolution 7/29/10
Amanda's Amendments on West Hayden Island Resolution 7/29/10
Public Safety bond referral
Process for review of Cellular facilities in neighborhoods
Schools/Parks Amendments 4/28/10
Memo to Council on Schools/Parks Code project
City report on 2010 Oregon Legislative session
Central City Concern - spending taxpayers' money wisely
Report on Central City Concern's program effectiveness
Tree removal and construction on I-5 in SW
2010 Regional Graffiti All-Stars
Tibet Proclamation
Neighborhoods in the News, Summer/Fall 2009
Dirty Duck Demolition Permit remarks
Human Rights Commission statement on Aaron Campbell shooting
Questions and Comments on Bull Run Land Exchange and new Bull Run Code
US Postal Service letter on schedule for changing address from 39th Avenue to Cesar E Chavez Boulevard
Water Bureau Fulton/Willamette Park Pump Station
Independent Police Review Dec 2009 Quarterly report
Status of the Columbia River Crossing Bridge
Willamette Week article on Riverfest 2009
Potential Health Impacts of Wireless Facilities
Report on Prostitution Advisory Committee on 82nd Avenue (pdf)
Winter shelters information
Sharing Public Spaces Report
Visit with Gateway Area Business Association
Comments on Bull Run water treatment options, 7/27/09
Community Discussion on Sharing Public Spaces, 7/21/09
Community Discussion on Sharing Public Spaces, 7/18/09
Comments on Proposed Stadium in Lents Park
Statement of Concerns on Major League Soccer
Hayden Island Plan
My first 100 days
Report on the Office of Healthy Working Rivers
City Auditor Report on the City Government's Financial Condition
Office of Healthy Working Rivers organizational meetings
The Great Soccer Debate
"Made In Oregon" sign
Progress on defeating Graffiti
Radon Awareness Month