|
(PDF Document, 105kb)
(PDF Document, 37kb)
(PDF Document, 17,267kb)
(PDF Document, 18kb)
(PDF Document, 14kb)
(PDF Document, 28kb)
The federal government has preempted cities and states from denying or modifying wireless placements based solely on environmental considerations.
(PDF Document, 31kb)
Carriers have to complete this before the city will issue a permit to place facilities on a utility pole, or replace the pole with a taller one.
(PDF Document, 35kb)
These regulate how antennas and taller utility poles can be placed in the streets.
(PDF Document, 60kb)
These focus on achieving a balance between maintaining neighborhood character with the need for expanded wireless service in neighborhoods.
(PDF Document, 14kb)
NOTE: the column labeled "Proposed' is current through June 30, 2009. The column labeled 'current' was effective through Dec 2008.
(PDF Document, 53kb)
This is a clean version of what the Council discussed in Nov and Dec, 2008.
(PDF Document, 63kb)
This shows and explains all substantive edits that were made to the 10-20-08 version.
(PDF Document, 22kb)
Wireless companies need to fill this out when requesting antennae on utility poles. This shows the minor changes made to the 10-20-08 checklist, below.
This summarizes the first set of requirements that were in effect for placing wireless antennae and equipment on utility poles.
(PDF Document, 27kb)
(PDF Document, 53kb)
(PDF Document, 61kb)
(PDF Document, 31kb)
This would accompany requests to locate wireless equipment on utility poles and would demonstrate that there are no colocation alternatives to site it on other structures.
(PDF Document, 58kb)
(PDF Document, 64kb)
This is a summary of the 357 separate responses we received through the Open Comments portion of the survey.
(PDF Document, 65kb)
We received 901 distinct survey responses
(PDF Document, 139kb)
Here is the online survey instrument exactly as it appeared to respondents.
Survey participants could view these photos and enlarge them to gain perspective while answering survey questions
(PDF Document, 57kb)
Summary of comments made at the three public meetings in March, 2008.
(PDF Document, 39kb)
This letter responds to questions neighbors have regarding specifics of how and why taller utility poles are allowed, and are more desireable than cell towers in residential and other areas.
(PDF Document, 15kb)
Resolution No. 36089 authorizing the Wireless Right-of-Way Agreement application procedures and administration. The adopted wireless right-of-way agreement is Exhibit A to this resolution.
(PDF Document, 191kb)
Ordinance No. 36089, adopted by Council July 24, 2002
|
| |