14B.70.030 Procedure.
When the City believes the motel property has become a public nuisance as
defined in this Chapter, the City shall attempt to notify the owner(s) of record
and the person, firm, or corporation in possession of the property, in writing
that the property has been determined to be a public nuisance. The notice shall
contain the following information:
A. The street address and a legal description sufficient for
identification of the property.
B. A statement that the City has found the property to be a public
nuisance, together with a concise description of the events or conditions
leading to this finding, including the date and time of the events or
conditions.
C. Demand that the owner or rightful possessor of the motel property
respond within twenty (20) days to the Chief of Police or the Precinct Commander
and appeal the City’s determination or propose an abatement plan that the Chief
of Police or the Precinct Commander agrees will abate the nuisance activities
giving rise to the violation.
D. The City shall attempt to serve a copy of the notice personally on the
owner, rightful possessor, or agent, if known, at least ten (10) days before the
commencement of any judicial action by the City. In addition, the notice shall
be mailed certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and
addressed to the owner of the business at the address of the property believed
to be a public nuisance and to such other address as is shown on Multnomah
County tax rolls, or such other place which is believed to give the owner of the
business and of the property actual notice of the City’s determination.
E. The failure of any person or owner to receive actual notice of the
funding of a public nuisance as defined in this Chapter shall not invalidate or
otherwise affect the proceedings under this Chapter.
14B.70.040 Appeals Process
A. If the owner, business, agent, or rightful possessor of the property
disagrees with the City’s findings and determination, the owner or other
rightful possessor may file an appeal with Bureau of Police within twenty (20)
days of the City’s determination that the motel property is a public nuisance.
B. The request for the appeal shall be in writing, and include the owner
or rightful possessor’s full name, street address and legal description
sufficient for identification of the property determined a public nuisance, and
the reason(s) for disagreement with the City’s findings and determination.
C. Should the owner or rightful possessor of the property be
dissatisfied with the outcome of the appeal, the owner or rightful possessor may
issue a further appeal to the City Code Hearings Officer pursuant to Chapter
22.10 of this Code.
14B.70.050 City Remedies.
A. The Chief of Police or the Precinct Commander may refer the matter to
the City Attorney where:
1.
The owner or rightful possessor fails to respond within twenty (20)
days from the determination that the motel property constitutes a public
nuisance by the Chief of Police or Precinct Commander, either by appealing the
City’s determination or by submitting a proposed abatement plan as provided in
this Chapter;
2. No agreeable written abatement plan for abatement is reached within
thirty (30) days from determination of a public nuisance by the Chief of
Police or the Precinct Commander;
3. The owner or rightful possessor fails to execute commencement of the
abatement plan within a reasonable amount of time, not to exceed sixty (60)
days of the plan’s enactment; or
4. The owner or rightful possessor fails to comply and maintain
compliance with all conditions of the written abatement plan for one year.
B. Failure to respond or failure to propose an abatement plan shall be
prima facie evidence of the owner or rightful possessor’s lack of cooperation.
Failure to execute or comply with any abatement plan shall be prima facie
evidence of lack of good faith in mitigating or correcting the situation.
C. When the owner or rightful possessor makes a response to the Chief of
Police or the Precinct Commander as required by this Chapter, any conduct or
statements made in connection with the response does not constitute an admission
that any nuisance activities have occurred or are occurring. This Subsection
does not require the exclusion of any evidence which is otherwise admissible or
offered for any other purpose.
D. If a court determines a motel to be a public nuisance within the
meaning of this Chapter, the court may order any remedy it deems appropriate to
abate the nuisance, including a civil penalties not to exceed $500 for the first
occasion and not to exceed $2,500 for the second occasion, and closure of the
motel for up to six months for the third occasion.