(Amended by Ordinance No. 179162, effective March 30, 2005.) To ensure
appropriateness and consistency in handling complaints the Director shall work
with the Committee to establish procedures for taking action based upon the
characteristics of the complaint.
A. Mediation. The complainant, the Member, and Bureau
administration must all agree before a mediation can be conducted. A complaint
that undergoes mediation shall not be investigated. A mediation may be suspended
if, in the opinion of the mediator, there is no reasonable likelihood of
reaching resolution.
B. IAD Investigation. The IPR shall gather information from
the complainant and forward it to the IAD. The IPR shall monitor timeliness and
disposition of the investigation.
To facilitate review, IAD shall tape record all interviews with witnesses,
including members of the Bureau, conducted during an IAD investigation and shall
make those tapes, or accurate copies, available during a review of an IAD
investigation.
In carrying out its functions, the IPR may visit IAD offices, examine
documents, reports and files and take such other actions as the Director deems
necessary and consistent with the purposes of this Chapter. To maintain the
security of IAD documents, reports or files, the Chief may require that the
examinations be conducted in the IAD offices.
C. IAD Investigation with IPR Involvement. The Director may
determine that an IAD investigation should also involve IPR personnel. When
forwarding the complaint to IAD the Director shall notify the IAD Commander of
the extent that IPR personnel must be included in the investigation. IAD
personnel shall schedule interviews and other investigative activities to ensure
that IPR personnel can attend and participate.
When Bureau personnel are being interviewed IPR personnel shall direct
questions through the IAD investigator. The IAD investigator may either repeat
the question to the employee or direct the employee to answer the question.
IPR personnel shall have an opportunity to review and comment on draft
reports regarding an IAD investigation in which they participated to ensure
accuracy, thoroughness, and fairness.
D. IPR investigation with IAD involvement. The Director may
determine that IPR should investigate a complaint. If the Director concludes
that IAD has not done an adequate job investigating complaints against a
particular member, the Director may determine that IPR should investigate a
complaint against the member. If the Director concludes that IAD has not done an
adequate job investigating a particular category of complaints, the Director may
determine that IPR should investigate a complaint or complaints falling in that
category. If the Director concludes that IAD has not completed its
investigations in a timely manner, the Director may determine that IPR should
investigate some complaints. IPR investigations shall be conducted in
conformance with legal and collective bargaining provisions. Such investigations
shall not be initiated by the IPR Director involving matters currently in
litigation, or where a notice of tort claim has been filed.
The Director shall notify the IAD commander that IPR has undertaken an
investigation and the reason. The IAD commander shall appoint a liaison
investigator from that office within two working days to arrange and participate
in interviews. When Bureau personnel are being interviewed by IPR personnel the
IAD investigator may either repeat the question or direct the employee to answer
the question.
The Director shall provide the IAD commander and the Police Chief with a
report on the investigation. The Director shall provide the IAD commander and
the Police Chief with a report on the investigation, and present the IPR
findings to the Chief or designee to assist the Chief in determining what, if
any, action is appropriate. At the completion of the investigation and any
appeal process the records of the investigation shall be transferred to the IAD
offices for retention.
Complainants and members wishing to appeal an investigation by IPR or the
findings shall appeal to the Committee as described in City Code Section
3.21.160 A.2.
E. Referral. The Director may refer the complainant to
another bureau in the City or another agency that would be more appropriate to
address the complaint.
F. Dismissal. The Director may dismiss the complaint for the
following reasons:
1. the complainant could reasonably be expected to use, or
is using, another remedy or channel or tort claim for the grievance stated in
the complaint;
2. the complainant delayed too long in filing the
complaint to justify present examination;
3. even if all aspects of the complaint were true, no act
of misconduct would have occurred;
4. the complaint is trivial, frivolous or not made in good
faith;
5. other complaints must take precedence due to limited
public resources;
6. the complainant withdraws the complaint or fails to
complete necessary complaint steps.