PortlandOnline

POL Government Elected Officials Auditor LaVonne Griffin-Valade
Welcome
Portland City Auditor LaVonne Griffin-Valade

LaVonne Griffin-Valade
City Auditor

1221 SW 4th Avenue

Room 140

Portland, OR 97204

503-823-4082

E-mail Us

Public Records Requests

Service Efforts and Accomplishments: 2001-02 (Report 290) - Printable Version

Report Summary
 
This is the Portland City Auditor’s twelfth annual report on the performance of City government. It contains information on the Service Efforts and Accomplishments of the City’s largest and most visible public programs.
 
The report is intended to:
  • improve the public accountability of City government
  • assist council, management, and citizens in making decisions
  • help improve the delivery of public services
The report contains information on spending and staffing, workload, and performance results. To help readers understand the information, we provide three types of comparisons:
  • historical trends, both 5 and 10 years
  • targets and goals
  • six similar cities
The report also includes the results of the City Auditor’s 2002 Citizen Survey, in which 5,364 City residents rated the quality of City services. We randomly selected residents from the eight large neighborhood regions in Portland so our survey would statistically represent the opinions of all residents.
The following summary highlights the City of Portland’s most important performance trends and points out problem areas that may need attention. The reader is urged to read the entire report to more fully understand its objectives, scope and methodology, and the mission and work of each major program.
Additional copies of the complete 2001-02 Service Efforts and Accomplishments report can be obtained by visiting the Auditor’s Office web site at: www.portlandonline.com/auditor, or by calling: Audit Services Division, (503) 823-4005.
 
Significant performance trends
 
Service Results
  • Public safety has improved. Portland has fewer fires and serious crimes, and citizens feel safer in their neighborhoods
  • City Livability ratings remain high except in Outer Southeast and East neighborhoods
  • Progress in achieving housing and development results has slowed
  • Good quality water and cleaner rivers and streams, but environmental mandates increase customer rates
  • Physical condition of street system is declining and the street maintenance backlog is growing
Spending and staffing
  • Spending on most major City services is about average compared to other cities
  • Compared with 10 years ago, Environmental Services had the largest per capita spending increase, while spending on Fire and Transportation declined
  • Operating spending per capita for major City services increased 6 percent over the past five years.
Citizen satisfaction
  • Overall, 53 percent of citizens believe local government is doing a “good” or “very good” job at providing services, down from 61 percent in 2001
  • Citizen satisfaction with City of Portland services improved over the past decade but the 2002 survey revealed recent declines in many areas
  • Problems with customer billing system may account for lower satisfaction with water and sewer services in 2002
  • Street maintenance received its lowest rating in 10 years
  • Citizens are less satisfied with quality of police services
Some of the most important positive (+) and negative (-) results are summarized below. Complete results are presented in chapters 1 through 9.
 
Overall performance results
 
Public safety has improved significantly over the past ten years:
(+) Portlanders experience 53 percent fewer person crimes per 1,000 residents and 23 percent fewer property crimes per 1,000 residents
(+) residents feel safer walking in neighborhoods and downtown
(+) fires per 1,000 residents declined 25 percent, and lives lost per 100,000 residents is down 41 percent
(+) Portland has fewer structural fires than the average of other cities
(+) residents in the North and Inner Northeast feel significantly safer than they did 10 years ago
(-) citizen satisfaction with police service quality has dropped over the past five years
(-) fewer citizens are willing to work with police to improve their neighborhoods than 10 years ago
(-) fire and medical emergency response times remain much slower than established goals
Livability ratings remain high in most areas:
(+) 82 percent of citizens believe neighborhood livability is “good” or “very good” compared with 77 percent in 1993
(+) residents in the Inner Northeast neighborhood believe livability has increased significantly; 62 percent rated it “good” or “very good” in 1993 versus 82 percent in 2002
(+) neighborhoods had fewer nuisances and derelict buildings corrected
(+) citywide, Portlanders are satisfied with accessibility of buses, shopping, and parks
(-) however, residents of Outer Southeast and East neighborhoods are less satisfied with City services and neighborhood conditions
(-) traffic speed in neighborhoods is judged to be “bad” or “very bad” by 39 percent of residents
(-) residents are less satisfied with quality of parks ground maintenance and street cleanliness than 10 years ago
Progress in achieving housing and development results has slowed:
(+) Portland continues to surpass its goal of attaining 20 percent of the housing built in the region
(+) residents are more satisfied with new residential and commercial developments in neighborhoods
(-) residents believe the physical condition of housing has declined, and Outer Southeast neighbors feel much worse about their housing conditions
(-) over the past five years the number of housing units built dropped 36 percent
(-) the number of commercial building permits and construction trade permits dropped 17 percent and 27 percent respectively over the past five years
(-) review of building plans is slower than established targets
City residents enjoy good quality water and cleaner rivers and streams but pay higher rates:
(+) City drinking water meets all federal and state quality standards
(+) adjusted for inflation, the average residential water bill is unchanged
(+) revegetation projects, disconnected downspouts, and more sanitary sewer lines should help improve water in streams and rivers
(+) Over 80 acres of floodplain have been reclaimed and over 2,200 acres of watershed revegetated
(+) water effluent from the City’s two treatment plants meets environmental standards
(-) efforts to improve the quality of water in rivers and streams have significantly increased sewer and storm drainage rates
(-) problems implementing a new customer billing system have affected revenues, cash flow, and customer satisfaction ratings
Physical condition of City’s street system is declining:
(-) the backlog of unmet street maintenance needs remains at a ten-year high
(-) citizen ratings of street maintenance quality declined by 6 percent over ten years
(-) the percent of City streets in good condition declined 9 percent over 10 years
(-) citizens are relatively dissatisfied with traffic congestion, and pedestrian and bicyclist safety
(-) residents have not changed commuting habits – about 71 percent still prefer driving alone to work
(-) traffic congestion on major streets and thoroughfares is considered “bad” or “very bad” by 40 percent of residents
Overall city spending and staffing
 
The City spent about $1,162 per capita on eight major services in FY 2001-02:
  • Police and Environmental Services are the most costly City services per capita
  • BDS and Planning services are the least costly
  • BDS increases and Planning decreases are due to the merger of Planning’s development review activities into the new Bureau of Development Services
  • Over the past 5 years, Parks & Recreation had the largest percentage increases in spending and staffing
Overall citizen satisfaction
 
Residents are generally more satisfied with services than they were in 1993, but the 2002 survey revealed recent declines in satisfaction in many areas:
  • the highest rated City services remain Fire, Parks, and Recycling
  • Recreation and Sewers had the biggest increase in quality ratings over ten years
  • Street Maintenance had the largest decline in service ratings
  • the highest rated neighborhood features are: safety during the day and access to buses and parks
  • the lowest rated neighborhood features are housing affordability, neighborhood traffic speed, congestion on major streets, and safety of pedestrians and bicyclists
click on the report title below to view the full report in Adobe Acrobat format


Report #290, released December 31, 2002
 
requires the free Adobe Acrobat Reader from Adobe.com